Skip to main content
NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems logo

Main navigation

  • About Us
    • Overview
      • Spatial and Temporal Design
      • History
    • Vision and Management
    • Advisory Groups
      • Science, Technology & Education Advisory Committee
      • Technical Working Groups (TWGs)
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
      • Field Offices
    • User Accounts
    • Staff

    About Us

  • Data & Samples
    • Data Portal
      • Explore Data Products
      • Data Availability Charts
      • Spatial Data & Maps
      • Document Library
      • API & GraphQL
      • Prototype Data
      • External Lab Data Ingest (restricted)
    • Samples & Specimens
      • Discover and Use NEON Samples
        • Sample Types
        • Sample Repositories
        • Sample Explorer
        • Megapit and Distributed Initial Characterization Soil Archives
        • Excess Samples
      • Sample Processing
      • Sample Quality
      • Taxonomic Lists
    • Collection Methods
      • Protocols & Standardized Methods
      • Airborne Remote Sensing
        • Flight Box Design
        • Flight Schedules and Coverage
        • Daily Flight Reports
          • AOP Flight Report Sign Up
        • Camera
        • Imaging Spectrometer
        • Lidar
      • Automated Instruments
        • Site Level Sampling Design
        • Sensor Collection Frequency
        • Instrumented Collection Types
          • Meteorology
          • Phenocams
          • Soil Sensors
          • Ground Water
          • Surface Water
      • Observational Sampling
        • Site Level Sampling Design
        • Sampling Schedules
        • Observation Types
          • Aquatic Organisms
            • Aquatic Microbes
            • Fish
            • Macroinvertebrates & Zooplankton
            • Periphyton, Phytoplankton, and Aquatic Plants
          • Terrestrial Organisms
            • Birds
            • Ground Beetles
            • Mosquitoes
            • Small Mammals
            • Soil Microbes
            • Terrestrial Plants
            • Ticks
          • Hydrology & Geomorphology
            • Discharge
            • Geomorphology
          • Biogeochemistry
          • DNA Sequences
          • Pathogens
          • Sediments
          • Soils
            • Soil Descriptions
    • Data Notifications
    • Data Guidelines and Policies
      • Acknowledging and Citing NEON
      • Publishing Research Outputs
      • Usage Policies
    • Data Management
      • Data Availability
      • Data Formats and Conventions
      • Data Processing
      • Data Quality
      • Data Product Revisions and Releases
        • Release 2021
        • Release 2022
        • Release 2023
      • NEON and Google
      • Externally Hosted Data

    Data & Samples

  • Field Sites
    • About Field Sites and Domains
    • Explore Field Sites
    • Site Management Data Product

    Field Sites

  • Impact
    • Observatory Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Spotlights
    • Papers & Publications
    • Newsroom
      • NEON in the News
      • Newsletter Archive
      • Newsletter Sign Up

    Impact

  • Resources
    • Getting Started with NEON Data & Resources
    • Documents and Communication Resources
      • Papers & Publications
      • Document Library
      • Outreach Materials
    • Code Hub
      • Code Resources Guidelines
      • Code Resources Submission
      • NEON's GitHub Organization Homepage
    • Learning Hub
      • Science Videos
      • Tutorials
      • Workshops & Courses
      • Teaching Modules
      • Faculty Mentoring Networks
      • Data Education Fellows
    • Research Support and Assignable Assets
      • Field Site Coordination
      • Letters of Support
      • Mobile Deployment Platforms
      • Permits and Permissions
      • AOP Flight Campaigns
      • Excess Samples
      • Assignable Assets FAQs
    • Funding Opportunities

    Resources

  • Get Involved
    • Advisory Groups
      • Science, Technology & Education Advisory Committee
      • Technical Working Groups
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • NEON Ambassador Program
    • Collaborative Works
      • EFI-NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge
      • NCAR-NEON-Community Collaborations
      • NEON Science Summit
      • NEON Great Lakes User Group
    • Community Engagement
    • Science Seminars and Data Skills Webinars
    • Work Opportunities
      • Careers
      • Seasonal Fieldwork
      • Postdoctoral Fellows
      • Internships
        • Intern Alumni
    • Partners

    Get Involved

  • My Account
  • Search

Search

Impact

  • Observatory Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Spotlights
  • Papers & Publications
  • Newsroom

Breadcrumb

  1. Impact
  2. Observatory Blog
  3. When Permafrost Thaws—Over and Over Again

Case Study

When Permafrost Thaws—Over and Over Again

May 18, 2022

Oksrukuyik Creek aquatic field site in Alaska

What happens to permafrost when the frost isn't quite so…permanent?

As the Arctic climate warms, many areas where soils were previously frozen year-round are now experiencing cycles of freezing and thawing. Dr. Erin Rooney, who recently earned her Ph.D. from Oregon State University, set out to discover how these cycles are changing the physical structure of Arctic soils—using soil cores from NEON's Toolik Field Station (TOOL). She and her coauthors recently published their findings in Geoderma: Soil pore network response to freeze-thaw cycles in permafrost aggregates.

From Permafrost to Not-so-Perma

As the climate continues to change, the Arctic is warming at more than twice the rate as the rest of the globe. One of the results has been a rapid warming of Arctic soils. Permafrost—a thick layer of subsurface soil that has historically remained frozen at all times of the year—is starting to thaw in many places.

But this thawing doesn't happen all at once. Rooney explains, "Permafrost isn't bimodal; it doesn't just go from frozen to thawed. It goes from frozen to freeze-thaw, experiencing seasonal and daily fluctuations in temperature that create cycles of freezing and thawing. This is different from just warming."

Soil temperatures that fluctuate around the freezing point of water (32°F/0°C) create cycles of freezing and thawing as ice turns to water and back again. Because of the physical properties of water, which expands when it freezes, Rooney anticipated that these freeze-thaw cycles would have an impact on soil structure, in particular the network of pores that permeates the soil.

"When you think of soil, you're usually thinking of the material components of the soil—rocks, minerals, organic matter, etc.," she says. "But what I was interested in was the air- and water-filled spaces in the soil, or soil pores. I wanted to understand how freeze-thaw cycles impacted pore morphology—how they are shaped—and how they are connected together." Changes in pore morphology and connectivity could, in turn, impact the ability of the soil to hold water, with potentially significant effects on soil function and plant and microbial communities.

Sponges and Tennis Rackets

Rooney explains that soil structure can vary widely across regions and soil types. "Soil pores can look different in different soils. Some soils are more like a sponge, with lots of small holes that hold water well. Other soils are more like a tennis racket, with big holes that allow water to drain quickly. I wanted to understand how freeze-thaw cycles might control the pore network. Perhaps we might see a shift from more sponge to more tennis racket."

Coauthor Adrian Gallo looks at arctic soil core

Coauthor Adrian Gallo looks at arctic soil cores. Photo credit: Erin Rooney.

To study the impact of freeze-thaw cycles on previously frozen soils, she acquired some frozen soil cores from Toolik Field Station, one of NEON's Tundra (D18) field stations in Alaska. Toolik is located in the Arctic foothills of the Brooks Range, nearly 160 miles (155 km) above the Arctic Circle. At this latitude, air temperatures only rise above 32°F/0°C in the brief summer months, and the soil remains largely frozen year-round. This gave Rooney an opportunity to secure soil core samples with minimal freeze-thaw history. Dr. Michael SanClements, a lead research scientist for the NEON program and a coauthor on the paper, helped her secure the samples. Dr. Angela Possinger, then a post-doc at Virginia Tech, was instrumental in employing the R package they used for analysis of NEON soil temperature data.

Three soil core samples were shipped frozen to a laboratory, where subsamples were subjected to five freeze-thaw cycles. Each aggregate was divided into two portions with varying moisture levels (12-16% vs. 28%) so researchers could look at how water content impacted the results. After each freeze-thaw cycle, the samples were analyzed using non-destructive, high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (XCT) imaging. This imaging technique provided a close-up look at the pore network inside each soil sample.

So, did the soil become more spongy or more racket-y? Rooney says, "It's more complicated than that. We can see the soil is changing, but the results varied. It may be that the response varies depending on the initial characteristics of the pore network, the composition of the soil or its particular freeze-thaw history. More research is going to be needed here, but we did find some interesting changes." Overall, they see less connectivity between pores and more singly-connected pores after repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Freezing and thawing also seems to reduce the overall volume of connected water-filled pores. A simplified pore network with fewer connections influences how water can travel through the network and, potentially, how readily available water and carbon are for microbes in the soil. A simpler pore network may also be a less resilient network.

Soil in a Changing Arctic Landscape

Rooney and her coauthors are now continuing the work with a new analysis of soils from both Toolik and Healy (HEAL), an Alaskan Taiga site (D19) located near Denali National Park, about 300 miles south of TOOL. In this study, they examine the impact of freeze-thaw cycles on soil carbon at different depths in the soil cores from the two sites. Using cores from TOOL and HEAL allows them to look for differences in response that may be related to prior freeze-thaw history. While the soil has similar freeze-thaw history at the deepest layers at both sites, the upper layers at HEAL have experienced significantly more cycles of thawing and re-freezing historically.

Permafrost soil core,

Permafrost soil core, collected by coauthor and NEON staff Mike SanClements. Photo credit: Erin Rooney.

Cryoturbated organic soil from Healy

Cryoturbated organic soil from Healy (HEAL). Photo credit: Erin Rooney.

Once again, results are interesting but mixed, suggesting that other factors in addition to freeze-thaw history are likely to be at work. Rooney says, "It's possible that the way permafrost formed initially may inform differences in carbon molecular composition and its susceptibility to decomposition. There are two types of permafrost: syngenetic permafrost is frozen at the time soil is being deposited, while epigenetic permafrost is frozen after organic materials have been deposited. Carbon may already be oxidized and ready to be decomposed more quickly in epigenetic permafrost."

Understanding how soil will respond to changing freeze-thaw cycles, both physically and biogeochemically, is important for building better models of how the Arctic will respond to climate change. As permafrost thaws, there are growing concerns about the potential for large greenhouse gas emissions from organic compounds that are currently locked in ice. But changes in soil structure and chemistry may also impact the Arctic in other potentially unexpected ways, from its ability to hold moisture to nutrient availability for microorganisms and plants. Studies like these provide a basis to help the research community understand how the Arctic is changing and predict the impact of these changes on plant, animal, and microbial communities in the future.

Rooney is now headed to the University of Tennessee – Knoxville, where she will continue her Arctic research through a fellowship at the Office of Polar Programs, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). She says, "NEON basically made my Ph.D.! Working with the NEON program has been a great experience. Having these cores available to me made this research possible."

Share

Related Posts:

A Drone of Our Own: NEON Adds Drone-Based Leaf Sampling Protocol
December 8, 2022
Investigating the Diversity-Stability Relationship on a Grand Scale
November 10, 2022
Combining Lidar and Hyperspectral Data to Understand Plant Biodiversity
October 19, 2022
NEON Logo

Follow Us:

Join Our Newsletter

Get updates on events, opportunities, and how NEON is being used today.

Subscribe Now

Footer

  • My Account
  • About Us
  • Newsroom
  • Contact Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Careers

Copyright © Battelle, 2019-2020

The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.