Skip to main content
NSF NEON, Operated by Battelle

Main navigation

  • About
    • NEON Overview
      • Vision and Management
      • Spatial and Temporal Design
      • History
    • About the NEON Biorepository
      • ASU Biorepository Staff
      • Contact the NEON Biorepository
    • Observatory Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Staff
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

    About

  • Data
    • Data Portal
      • Data Availability Charts
      • API & GraphQL
      • Prototype Data
      • Externally Hosted Data
    • Data Collection Methods
      • Airborne Observation Platform (AOP)
      • Instrument System (IS)
        • Instrumented Collection Types
        • Aquatic Instrument System (AIS)
        • Terrestrial Instrument System (TIS)
      • Observational System (OS)
        • Observation Types
        • Observational Sampling Design
        • Sampling Schedules
        • Taxonomic Lists Used by Field Staff
        • Optimizing the Observational Sampling Designs
      • Protocols & Standardized Methods
    • Getting Started with NEON Data
      • neonUtilities for R and Python
      • Learning Hub
      • Code Hub
    • Using Data
      • Data Formats and Conventions
      • Released, Provisional, and Revised Data
      • Data Product Bundles
      • Usage Policies
      • Acknowledging and Citing NEON
      • Publishing Research Outputs
    • Data Notifications
    • NEON Data Management
      • Data Availability
      • Data Processing
      • Data Quality

    Data

  • Samples & Specimens
    • Biorepository Sample Portal at ASU
    • About Samples
      • Sample Types
      • Sample Repositories
      • Megapit and Distributed Initial Characterization Soil Archives
    • Finding and Accessing Sample Data
      • Species Checklists
      • Sample Explorer - Relationships and Data
      • Biorepository API
    • Requesting and Using Samples
      • Loans & Archival Requests
      • Usage Policies

    Samples & Specimens

  • Field Sites
    • Field Site Map and Info
    • Spatial Layers & Printable Maps

    Field Sites

  • Resources
    • Getting Started with NEON Data
    • Research Support Services
      • Field Site Coordination
      • Letters of Support
      • Mobile Deployment Platforms
      • Permits and Permissions
      • AOP Flight Campaigns
      • Research Support FAQs
      • Research Support Projects
    • Code Hub
      • neonUtilities for R and Python
      • Code Resources Guidelines
      • Code Resources Submission
      • NEON's GitHub Organization Homepage
    • Learning Hub
      • Tutorials
      • Workshops & Courses
      • Science Videos
      • Teaching Modules
    • Science Seminars and Data Skills Webinars
    • Document Library
    • Funding Opportunities

    Resources

  • Impact
    • Research Highlights
    • Papers & Publications
    • NEON in the News

    Impact

  • Get Involved
    • Upcoming Events
    • Research and Collaborations
      • Environmental Data Science Innovation and Inclusion Lab
      • Collaboration with DOE BER User Facilities and Programs
      • EFI-NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge
      • NEON Great Lakes User Group
      • NCAR-NEON-Community Collaborations
    • Advisory Groups
      • Science, Technology & Education Advisory Committee
      • Technical Working Groups
    • NEON Ambassador Program
      • Exploring NEON-Derived Data Products Workshop Series
    • Partnerships
    • Community Engagement
    • Work Opportunities

    Get Involved

  • My Account
  • Search

Search

Learning Hub

  • Tutorials
  • Workshops & Courses
  • Science Videos
  • Teaching Modules

Breadcrumb

  1. Resources
  2. Learning Hub
  3. Tutorials
  4. The Importance of Reproducible Science

Tutorial

The Importance of Reproducible Science

Authors: Megan A. Jones

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2020

Verifiability and reproducibility are among the cornerstones of the scientific process. They are what allows scientists to "stand on the shoulder of giants". Maintaining reproducibility requires that all data management, analysis, and visualization steps behind the results presented in a paper are documented and available in full detail. Reproducibility here means that someone else should either be able to obtain the same results given all the documented inputs and the published instructions for processing them, or if not, the reasons why should be apparent. From Reproducible Science Curriculum

## Learning Objectives At the end of this activity, you will be able to:
  • Summarize the four facets of reproducibility.
  • Describe several ways that reproducible workflows can improve your workflow and research.
  • Explain several ways you can incorporate reproducible science techniques into your own research.

Getting Started with Reproducible Science

Please view the online slide-show below which summarizes concepts taught in the Reproducible Science Curriculum.

View Reproducible Science Slideshow

A Gap In Understanding

Image of a Twitter post submitted by Tracy Steal highlighting the obstacles slowing adoption of reproducible science pratices. These are: People are unaware there is a problem, 100% reproducibility is hard, One workflow does not fit all, Lack of motivation, and are scared of intial time investments.
Obstacles slowing adoption of reproducible science practices. Source: Reproducible Science Curriculum

Reproducibility and Your Research

Graphic showing the spectrum of reproducibility for published research. From left to right, left being not reproducible and right being the gold standard, we have publication only, publication plus code, publication plus code and data, publication with linked and executable code and data, and full replication.
Reproducibility spectrum for published research. Source: Peng, RD Reproducible Research in Computational Science Science (2011): 1226–1227 via Reproducible Science Curriculum

How reproducible is your current research?

View Reproducible Science Checklist

**Thought Questions:** Have a look at the reproducible science check list linked, above and answer the following questions:
  • Do you currently apply any of the items in the checklist to your research?
  • Are there elements in the list that you are interested in incorporating into your workflow? If so, which ones?

Additional Readings (optional)

  • Nature has collated and published (with open-access) a special archive on the Challenges of Irreproducible Science .
  • The Nature Publishing group has also created a Reporting Checklist for its authors that focuses primaily on reporting issues but also includes sections for sharing code.
  • Recent open-access issue of Ecography focusing on reproducible ecology and software packages available for use.
  • A nice short blog post with an annotated bibliography of "Top 10 papers discussing reproducible research in computational science" from Lorena Barba: Barba group reproducibility syllabus.

Questions?

If you have questions or comments on this content, please contact us.

Contact Us
NSF NEON, Operated by Battelle

Follow Us:

Join Our Newsletter

Get updates on events, opportunities, and how NEON is being used today.

Subscribe Now

Footer

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Careers
  • Code of Conduct

Copyright © Battelle, 2026

The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.