Skip to main content
NSF NEON, Operated by Battelle

Main navigation

  • About
    • NEON Overview
      • Vision and Management
      • Spatial and Temporal Design
      • History
    • About the NEON Biorepository
      • ASU Biorepository Staff
      • Contact the NEON Biorepository
    • Observatory Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Staff
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

    About

  • Data
    • Data Portal
      • Data Availability Charts
      • API & GraphQL
      • Prototype Data
      • Externally Hosted Data
    • Data Collection Methods
      • Airborne Observation Platform (AOP)
      • Instrument System (IS)
        • Instrumented Collection Types
        • Aquatic Instrument System (AIS)
        • Terrestrial Instrument System (TIS)
      • Observational System (OS)
        • Observation Types
        • Observational Sampling Design
        • Sampling Schedules
        • Taxonomic Lists Used by Field Staff
        • Optimizing the Observational Sampling Designs
      • Protocols & Standardized Methods
    • Getting Started with NEON Data
      • neonUtilities for R and Python
      • Learning Hub
      • Code Hub
    • Using Data
      • Data Formats and Conventions
      • Released, Provisional, and Revised Data
      • Data Product Bundles
      • Usage Policies
      • Acknowledging and Citing NEON
      • Publishing Research Outputs
    • Data Notifications
    • NEON Data Management
      • Data Availability
      • Data Processing
      • Data Quality

    Data

  • Samples & Specimens
    • Biorepository Sample Portal at ASU
    • About Samples
      • Sample Types
      • Sample Repositories
      • Megapit and Distributed Initial Characterization Soil Archives
    • Finding and Accessing Sample Data
      • Species Checklists
      • Sample Explorer - Relationships and Data
      • Biorepository API
    • Requesting and Using Samples
      • Loans & Archival Requests
      • Usage Policies

    Samples & Specimens

  • Field Sites
    • Field Site Map and Info
    • Spatial Layers & Printable Maps

    Field Sites

  • Resources
    • Getting Started with NEON Data
    • Research Support Services
      • Field Site Coordination
      • Letters of Support
      • Mobile Deployment Platforms
      • Permits and Permissions
      • AOP Flight Campaigns
      • Research Support FAQs
      • Research Support Projects
    • Code Hub
      • neonUtilities for R and Python
      • Code Resources Guidelines
      • Code Resources Submission
      • NEON's GitHub Organization Homepage
    • Learning Hub
      • Tutorials
      • Workshops & Courses
      • Science Videos
      • Teaching Modules
    • Science Seminars and Data Skills Webinars
    • Document Library
    • Funding Opportunities

    Resources

  • Impact
    • Research Highlights
    • Papers & Publications
    • NEON in the News

    Impact

  • Get Involved
    • Upcoming Events
    • Research and Collaborations
      • Environmental Data Science Innovation and Inclusion Lab
      • Collaboration with DOE BER User Facilities and Programs
      • EFI-NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge
      • NEON Great Lakes User Group
      • NCAR-NEON-Community Collaborations
    • Advisory Groups
      • Science, Technology & Education Advisory Committee
      • Technical Working Groups
    • NEON Ambassador Program
      • Exploring NEON-Derived Data Products Workshop Series
    • Partnerships
    • Community Engagement
    • Work Opportunities

    Get Involved

  • My Account
  • Search

Search

About

  • NEON Overview
  • About the NEON Biorepository
  • Observatory Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Staff
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us

Breadcrumb

  1. About
  2. Observatory Blog
  3. Finding of No Significant Impact on NEON Environmental Assessment

Finding of No Significant Impact on NEON Environmental Assessment

December 15, 2009

In Fall 2009 NSF prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) that evaluated the potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts associated with construction and operation of NEON, and invited public participation in the proposed federal action through the NEPA process. Based on the EA analysis and with the condition that appropriate project design features and best management practices would be implemented as needed and additional agency coordination would be completed where necessary, NSF has determined that the implementation of NEON would not result in significant impacts to the natural or human environment and would have no effect on public health and safety, land use, topography, hydrogeology and groundwater, demographics, and community resources in any of the 20 NEON Domains. NSF released the EA for public comments on its website starting August 30, 2009. It also held two public meetings, one in Arlington, VA on September 15, 2009, and the other in Boulder, CO on September 17, 2009. Both meetings were webcasted live with call-in lines, and remote participants were also encouraged to send questions via e-mail or an interactive chat screen. The public comment period ended September 28, 2009. NSF considered all comments, and as appropriate, the EA was revised to address those comments. Comments received and NSF's responses are included in the final EA document. Of NEON's 60 candidate core and relocatable sites, approximately 46% are on federal land, 20% on private university land, 16% on state land and another 18% on local government and private land.

Share

Related Posts:

NEON operations coming to a close at Dead Lake, Alabama, field site

October 15, 2025

NEON Operations coming to a close at Dead Lake, Alabama, field site

October 15, 2025

Map with DELA field site marker
NSF NEON, Operated by Battelle

Follow Us:

Join Our Newsletter

Get updates on events, opportunities, and how NEON is being used today.

Subscribe Now

Footer

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Careers
  • Code of Conduct

Copyright © Battelle, 2026

The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Science Foundation.